What is the Difference Between "Who" and "Whom"? A Complete Guide for English Learners
You've probably tried apps, textbooks, and maybe even classes, but that elusive fluency still feels out of reach. The problem isn't you—it's that most advice ignores how adults actually acquire language. One of the trickiest hurdles? Understanding when to use "who" versus "whom." Even native speakers struggle with this, but I'm going to share a method that works.
I'm Idella Langworth, a CELTA and Delta-certified ESL instructor with 15 years of experience teaching at university-level language institutes and corporate coaching programs. In my years of teaching, I've noticed that the "who" versus "whom" question comes up in nearly every intermediate-level class, especially among Spanish-speaking learners who are advancing in their careers or academic pursuits in the United States.
The confusion is understandable. English pronoun cases work differently than in Spanish, and even native English speakers often get this wrong in casual conversation. But here's what I've learned: once you understand the underlying pattern, this grammar point becomes automatic. Let me show you exactly how.
![]() |
What is the Difference Between "Who" and "Whom"? A Complete Guide for English Learners |
The Grammar Foundation: Subject vs. Object Pronouns
At its core, the "who" versus "whom" distinction is about grammatical roles. This isn't just academic theory—understanding this principle will improve your overall English fluency and make you sound more sophisticated in professional settings.
Who functions as a subject pronoun. It performs the action in a sentence, just like "he," "she," or "they." Whom functions as an object pronoun. It receives the action, just like "him," "her," or "them."
Here's the simple test I teach my students: if you can replace the word with "he" or "she," use "who." If you can replace it with "him" or "her," use "whom."
Let me demonstrate with real examples from workplace situations:
"Who is presenting at tomorrow's meeting?" → "He is presenting" → Who is correct.
"To whom should I address this complaint?" → "I should address it to him" → Whom is correct.
This substitution method works because English maintains parallel structures between interrogative pronouns (who/whom) and personal pronouns (he/him, she/her). It's a linguistic pattern that, once recognized, becomes intuitive.
The Biggest Myth About Learning Grammar (And What To Do Instead)
Many language learners believe they need to memorize complex rules and exceptions. This approach fails because it treats grammar as abstract theory rather than functional communication. In my experience teaching corporate clients, the professionals who advance fastest are those who understand grammar patterns through real-world usage.
The myth that "whom" is dying out in English actually works against learners. While it's true that casual spoken English often uses "who" in all positions, formal writing and professional communication still distinguish between the two. Knowing when to use "whom" correctly signals sophisticated language skills to employers, colleagues, and academic institutions.
I had a student, Carlos, an engineering manager who was preparing for executive interviews. He kept avoiding sentences where he wasn't sure about "who" versus "whom," which made his speech sound awkward and hesitant. Once he mastered the substitution method, his confidence in formal presentations improved dramatically.
![]() |
The Biggest Myth About Learning Grammar (And What To Do Instead) |
The 20-Minute Daily Habit for Mastering Who vs. Whom
Here's the systematic approach I've developed through years of teaching:
Week 1: Recognition Phase Spend 5 minutes daily reading business emails, news articles, or formal documents. When you encounter "who" or "whom," pause and apply the substitution test. Don't worry about production yet—just build recognition.
Week 2: Controlled Practice Write three sentences daily using "who" and three using "whom." Start with simple contexts: introducing people, asking about contacts, describing workplace scenarios. Focus on accuracy over complexity.
Week 3: Real-World Application Incorporate "whom" into one professional email daily. This might feel forced initially, but it builds confidence in formal communication. Many of my students report that colleagues notice their improved language precision.
Week 4: Natural Integration By this point, the pattern should feel automatic. Focus on using these pronouns in speaking situations: meetings, phone calls, presentations.
This progressive approach works because it mirrors natural language acquisition: comprehension before production, controlled practice before free expression.
Breaking Through Intermediate Plateaus: Advanced Usage Patterns
Once you've mastered basic "who" versus "whom" distinctions, you can tackle more sophisticated constructions that distinguish advanced speakers from intermediate learners.
Relative Clauses in Professional Writing Consider these examples from business contexts:
"The consultant whom we hired last month has exceeded expectations." (Object of the verb "hired")
"The manager who approved this budget is attending the review." (Subject performing "approved")
Preposition Combinations This is where many learners struggle, even at advanced levels:
"From whom did you receive this information?" (Object of preposition "from")
"With whom will you be traveling?" (Object of preposition "with")
In informal speech, these often become "Who did you receive this information from?" and "Who will you be traveling with?" Both are acceptable in casual conversation, but formal writing maintains the traditional structure.
Questions Within Questions Advanced speakers navigate embedded questions smoothly:
"Do you know who is handling the Peterson account?" (Subject of embedded clause)
"Can you tell me whom they selected for the position?" (Object of embedded clause)
According to the 2024 American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (ACTFL) proficiency guidelines, distinguishing these patterns accurately is a marker of advanced-level proficiency.
![]() |
Breaking Through Intermediate Plateaus: Advanced Usage Patterns |
Mastering Nuance for Business and Academic Success
Professional English requires not just grammatical accuracy but also stylistic appropriateness. Understanding when to use formal constructions versus more relaxed alternatives demonstrates cultural fluency.
Email Communication Standards In professional emails, "To whom it may concern" remains standard for formal inquiries. However, "Who should I contact about..." is perfectly acceptable for internal communications. The key is matching formality levels to context and audience.
Academic Writing Expectations Universities and professional publications expect consistent use of "whom" in object positions. A 2024 study from the journal Language Learning & Technology found that graduate students who used formal pronouns correctly were rated as more competent by faculty reviewers, independent of content quality.
Cultural Code-Switching Advanced speakers adapt their language to social contexts. Using "whom" appropriately in formal situations while relaxing to "who" in casual conversation demonstrates sophisticated cultural awareness.
I remember working with Sofia, a lawyer preparing for partnership interviews. She initially avoided complex question structures because she wasn't confident about pronoun usage. After mastering these patterns, she reported feeling more authoritative in client meetings and colleague interactions.
Common Mistakes Spanish Speakers Make (And How To Fix Them)
Spanish speakers face specific challenges with English pronouns because Spanish relative pronouns work differently. "Que" serves multiple functions that English divides between "who," "whom," "that," and "which."
Overgeneralization Error Many learners use "who" in all positions because it's more common in spoken English. The fix: practice formal writing where "whom" usage is more consistent and noticeable.
Preposition Placement Confusion Spanish speakers sometimes struggle with "Whom are you talking to?" versus "To whom are you talking?" Both are grammatically correct, but they signal different formality levels.
Question Formation Interference Spanish question formation can interfere with English pronoun choice. Practice transforming statements into questions: "You gave the report to him" becomes "To whom did you give the report?"
The Science Behind Effective Pronoun Learning
Recent research in second language acquisition offers insights into why traditional grammar instruction often fails. Dr. Stephen Krashen's comprehensible input hypothesis suggests that learners acquire grammar through exposure to meaningful communication, not explicit rule memorization.
However, for adult learners in professional contexts, some explicit instruction accelerates acquisition. A 2024 study by the University of Pennsylvania found that combining pattern recognition with real-world practice reduced learning time by 40% compared to drill-based methods.
The substitution method I teach aligns with cognitive linguistics principles. By connecting new patterns ("who/whom") to known patterns ("he/him"), learners build on existing knowledge rather than memorizing isolated rules.
Duolingo's 2024 Language Report confirms that learners who practice grammar in context rather than isolation show better retention and transfer to real communication situations.
Technology and Traditional Methods: Finding the Right Balance
Modern language learning tools offer new possibilities for pronoun practice, but they can't replace human interaction and feedback. Here's how to leverage both effectively:
AI-Powered Practice Tools like ChatGPT can generate unlimited practice sentences and provide immediate feedback on "who" versus "whom" usage. Ask for business email examples or academic writing samples that require formal pronoun usage.
Traditional Reading Benefits Classic literature and formal publications still provide the best models for sophisticated pronoun usage. Reading The New York Times, Harvard Business Review, or academic journals exposes learners to natural, contextual examples.
Conversation Partners While apps provide convenience, human conversation partners notice and correct unnatural pronoun usage that automated systems might miss. They also provide real-time feedback on appropriateness across different social contexts.
![]() |
Technology and Traditional Methods: Finding the Right Balance |
Practical Exercises That Actually Work
Based on my experience with hundreds of students, these specific exercises produce the fastest improvement:
Exercise 1: Email Transformation Take informal emails and rewrite them formally, focusing on pronoun usage. "Who should I send this to?" becomes "To whom should I send this correspondence?"
Exercise 2: News Article Analysis Read business news and highlight every "who" and "whom." Apply the substitution test to verify correctness. This builds both recognition skills and professional vocabulary.
Exercise 3: Role-Play Scenarios Practice formal introductions and inquiries: "May I ask whom you represent?" or "To whom am I speaking?" These phrases are crucial for professional networking.
Exercise 4: Academic Writing Practice Write paragraph summaries of articles, deliberately including relative clauses with "who" and "whom." Academic writing requires consistent formal usage.
Debunking the "Whom is Dead" Myth
Some language guides claim that "whom" is disappearing from English. This oversimplification misleads learners. While casual conversation often uses "who" universally, formal writing maintains the distinction. Professional advancement often depends on formal communication skills.
Data from the Corpus of Contemporary American English shows that "whom" usage has stabilized rather than disappeared. It remains consistent in formal registers: academic writing, legal documents, business correspondence, and professional journalism.
For non-native speakers, using "whom" correctly signals sophisticated language skills. It demonstrates attention to detail and formal education—qualities valued in professional environments.
Creating Your Personal Learning Plan
Success with "who" versus "whom" requires systematic practice tailored to your specific goals and context. Here's how to create an effective personal plan:
Assess Your Current Level Take notes during one week of English usage. How often do you encounter situations requiring "who" or "whom"? What contexts make you hesitate or avoid these constructions?
Set Specific Goals Rather than "improve grammar," set measurable objectives: "Use 'whom' correctly in formal emails" or "Navigate complex relative clauses in presentations."
Choose Appropriate Materials Business professionals should focus on email writing and presentation skills. Academic students need practice with formal essay structures. Social learners can emphasize conversation patterns.
Track Progress Keep a learning journal noting successful usage and areas needing improvement. Many of my students find that documenting progress maintains motivation during challenging periods.
Beyond Grammar: Cultural Integration Through Language
Mastering "who" versus "whom" represents more than grammatical accuracy—it demonstrates cultural fluency and professional sophistication. In American business culture, language precision correlates with perceived competence and attention to detail.
International professionals often report that advanced grammar skills boost confidence in high-stakes situations: job interviews, client presentations, academic conferences. The psychological impact of speaking with certainty affects professional relationships and career advancement.
Understanding formal language registers also improves reading comprehension of complex texts: legal documents, academic research, industry publications. These skills compound over time, creating opportunities for continued professional and personal growth.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is "whom" really necessary in modern English?
A: While casual conversation often uses "who" universally, formal writing and professional communication maintain the distinction. Using "whom" correctly signals sophisticated language skills.
Why This is Tricky: Many language learning resources focus on conversational English, where "whom" is less common. This creates a gap between informal and formal registers.
The Simple Fix: Practice reading formal publications daily—business newspapers, academic articles, or professional journals. This exposure builds intuitive understanding of appropriate usage contexts.
For Example: In a job interview, "To whom would I report?" sounds more professional than "Who would I report to?" Both are grammatically acceptable, but the first demonstrates formal language mastery.
Q: How can Spanish speakers remember the difference between "who" and "whom"?
A: Use the substitution method: if "he/she" fits, use "who." If "him/her" fits, use "whom." This works because English maintains parallel patterns between interrogative and personal pronouns.
Why This is Tricky: Spanish "que" serves multiple functions that English divides between different pronouns. This requires learning new distinctions that don't exist in Spanish.
The Simple Fix: Practice the he/him substitution test daily. When reading or listening, pause at every "who/whom" and mentally substitute the appropriate personal pronoun.
For Example: "Who called you?" → "He called you" → use "who." "To whom did you speak?" → "You spoke to him" → use "whom."
Q: Should I worry about "whom" in spoken English?
A: In casual conversation, using "who" is generally acceptable. However, formal speaking situations—presentations, interviews, academic discussions—benefit from correct "whom" usage.
Why This is Tricky: Spoken and written English have different formality expectations. Many learners either avoid these constructions entirely or use them inappropriately.
The Simple Fix: Match your formality level to the context. Casual conversations can use "who" universally, but professional settings reward proper usage.
For Example: "Who are you going with?" (casual) versus "With whom will you be traveling?" (formal presentation about business trip).
Q: What's the most common mistake with "who" and "whom"?
A: Using "who" as the object of a preposition: "Who are you talking to?" instead of "To whom are you talking?" Both are acceptable in casual speech, but formal writing requires the second form.
Why This is Tricky: English allows preposition stranding (ending sentences with prepositions), which creates two grammatically correct options with different formality levels.
The Simple Fix: In formal writing, keep prepositions with their objects: "To whom," "For whom," "With whom." In speech, either form works.
For Example: Business email: "To whom should I direct this inquiry?" Casual conversation: "Who should I ask about this?"
Q: How long does it take to master "who" versus "whom"?
A: With systematic practice, most intermediate learners achieve consistent accuracy within 3-4 weeks. However, automatic usage in spontaneous speech may take 2-3 months of regular exposure.
Why This is Tricky: Grammatical knowledge doesn't immediately transfer to fluent production. The pattern must become automatic through repeated practice.
The Simple Fix: Combine recognition practice (reading formal texts) with production practice (writing exercises) and real-world application (professional communication).
For Example: Week 1: recognize patterns in reading. Week 2: controlled writing practice. Week 3: use in professional emails. Week 4: incorporate into presentations.
Q: Are there any tricks for remembering preposition + "whom" combinations?
A: Yes—memorize common formal phrases: "To whom it may concern," "From whom," "With whom," "For whom." These appear frequently in professional communication.
Why This is Tricky: Preposition placement differs between casual and formal registers, creating multiple correct options with different connotations.
The Simple Fix: Learn these as fixed phrases rather than analyzing each grammatically. This builds automatic usage for formal situations.
For Example: Memorize "To whom should I speak?" as a complete phrase for professional inquiries, rather than constructing it from individual grammar rules.
Q: Does age affect the ability to learn these pronoun distinctions?
A: While younger learners may acquire patterns faster through exposure, adult learners often excel at systematic grammar learning. The substitution method works effectively regardless of age.
Why This is Tricky: Adults sometimes assume grammar learning becomes impossible after a certain age, leading to avoidance rather than systematic practice.
The Simple Fix: Focus on pattern recognition and systematic practice rather than trying to develop "native-like" intuition. Adult analytical skills can be advantages in grammar learning.
For Example: A 45-year-old executive client mastered these patterns in three weeks using the substitution method, while maintaining full-time work responsibilities. Age was not a limiting factor.
Before you close this tab, try this one technique with any English text you're reading: find three sentences with "who" or "whom" and apply the substitution test. This five-minute practice will start building the automatic recognition that leads to fluent usage.
Mastering "who" versus "whom" opens doors to more sophisticated English expression and professional advancement. The key is systematic practice combined with real-world application. Start with recognition, progress to controlled practice, and gradually integrate these patterns into your daily English usage. With consistency and the right approach, this challenging grammar point becomes a strength that distinguishes your English as truly advanced.
Idella Langworth is a CELTA and Delta-certified ESL instructor with 15 years of experience teaching at university-level language institutes and providing corporate language coaching. She specializes in helping international professionals develop advanced English skills for career advancement in American business environments.